DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash
deepseek vs inclusionai
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.43× that of DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017).
On capability, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the higher intelligence index (45) — better for complex reasoning.
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash on a budget, or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for output quality. Full details below.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Metric | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.15 | $0.07 |
| Output /1M | $0.60 | $0.23 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.26 | $0.11 |
| Context | 1.0M | 262K |
| Intelligence | 45 | 41 |
| Coding | — | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Speed | 186 tok/s | 222 tok/s |
| CPS Grade | A | A |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.43× that of DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017). DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: $0.15 in / $0.6 out; inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash: $0.075 in / $0.225 out (per 1M tokens).
Which is smarter, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
On capability, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the higher intelligence index (45) — better for complex reasoning. Coding index: DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 — vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash —.
Which one should I choose?
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash on a budget, or DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 for output quality. Full details below.