Z.ai: GLM 4.7 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking
z-ai vs moonshotai
On price, Z.ai: GLM 4.7 is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.93× that of MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking).
On capability, Z.ai: GLM 4.7 has the higher intelligence index (22) — better for complex reasoning.
Verdict: pick Z.ai: GLM 4.7 on a budget, or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 for output quality. Full details below.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Metric | Z.ai: GLM 4.7 | MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.60 | $0.60 |
| Output /1M | $2.20 | $2.50 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.00 | $1.07 |
| Context | 205K | 262K |
| Intelligence | 22 | 22 |
| Coding | 45 | 35 |
| Math | 95 | 95 |
| Speed | 38 tok/s | 119 tok/s |
| CPS Grade | A | A |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Z.ai: GLM 4.7 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking?
On price, Z.ai: GLM 4.7 is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.93× that of MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking). Z.ai: GLM 4.7: $0.6 in / $2.2 out; MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking: $0.6 in / $2.5 out (per 1M tokens).
Which is smarter, Z.ai: GLM 4.7 or MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking?
On capability, Z.ai: GLM 4.7 has the higher intelligence index (22) — better for complex reasoning. Coding index: Z.ai: GLM 4.7 45 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2 Thinking 35.
Which one should I choose?
Verdict: pick Z.ai: GLM 4.7 on a budget, or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 for output quality. Full details below.