Z.ai: GLM 4.7 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash
z-ai vs inclusionai
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.03× that of Z.ai: GLM 4.7).
On capability, Z.ai: GLM 4.7 has the higher intelligence index (22) — better for complex reasoning.
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash on a budget, or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 for output quality. Full details below.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Metric | Z.ai: GLM 4.7 | inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.60 | $0.02 |
| Output /1M | $2.20 | $0.06 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.00 | $0.03 |
| Context | 205K | 262K |
| Intelligence | 22 | 20 |
| Coding | 45 | 51 |
| Math | 95 | — |
| Speed | 38 tok/s | 308 tok/s |
| CPS Grade | A | A |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Z.ai: GLM 4.7 or inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash?
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.03× that of Z.ai: GLM 4.7). Z.ai: GLM 4.7: $0.6 in / $2.2 out; inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash: $0.021 in / $0.063 out (per 1M tokens).
Which is smarter, Z.ai: GLM 4.7 or inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash?
On capability, Z.ai: GLM 4.7 has the higher intelligence index (22) — better for complex reasoning. Coding index: Z.ai: GLM 4.7 45 vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash 51.
Which one should I choose?
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash on a budget, or Z.ai: GLM 4.7 for output quality. Full details below.