inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash vs OpenAI: o3
inclusionai vs openai
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.01× that of OpenAI: o3).
On capability, OpenAI: o3 has the higher intelligence index (20) — better for complex reasoning.
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash on a budget, or OpenAI: o3 for output quality. Full details below.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Metric | inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash | OpenAI: o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.02 | $2.00 |
| Output /1M | $0.06 | $8.00 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.03 | $3.50 |
| Context | 262K | 200K |
| Intelligence | 20 | 20 |
| Coding | 51 | 38 |
| Math | — | 88 |
| Speed | 308 tok/s | 136 tok/s |
| CPS Grade | A | A |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash or OpenAI: o3?
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.01× that of OpenAI: o3). inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash: $0.021 in / $0.063 out; OpenAI: o3: $2 in / $8 out (per 1M tokens).
Which is smarter, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash or OpenAI: o3?
On capability, OpenAI: o3 has the higher intelligence index (20) — better for complex reasoning. Coding index: inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash 51 vs OpenAI: o3 38.
Which one should I choose?
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash on a budget, or OpenAI: o3 for output quality. Full details below.