DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash
deepseek vs inclusionai
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.38× that of DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash).
On capability, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash has the higher intelligence index (41) — better for complex reasoning.
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash on a budget, or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash for output quality. Full details below.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Metric | DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.05 | $0.04 |
| Output /1M | $0.57 | $0.14 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.18 | $0.07 |
| Context | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Intelligence | 40 | 41 |
| Coding | — | — |
| Math | — | — |
| Speed | 220 tok/s | 102 tok/s |
| CPS Grade | A | A |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.38× that of DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash). DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: $0.051 in / $0.567 out; inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash: $0.045 in / $0.135 out (per 1M tokens).
Which is smarter, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash?
On capability, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash has the higher intelligence index (41) — better for complex reasoning. Coding index: DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash — vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash —.
Which one should I choose?
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash on a budget, or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash for output quality. Full details below.