inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
inclusionai vs qwen
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.02× that of Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B).
On capability, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash has the higher intelligence index (41) — better for complex reasoning.
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash on a budget, or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash for output quality. Full details below.
Side-by-Side Specs
| Metric | inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash | Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| Input /1M | $0.04 | $2.00 |
| Output /1M | $0.14 | $6.00 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.07 | $3.00 |
| Context | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Intelligence | 41 | 40 |
| Coding | — | 72 |
| Math | — | — |
| Speed | 102 tok/s | 40 tok/s |
| CPS Grade | A | A |
FAQ
Which is cheaper, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
On price, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper (blended cost is about 0.02× that of Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B). inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash: $0.045 in / $0.135 out; Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: $2 in / $6 out (per 1M tokens).
Which is smarter, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash or Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
On capability, inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash has the higher intelligence index (41) — better for complex reasoning. Coding index: inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash — vs Qwen: Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 72.
Which one should I choose?
Verdict: pick inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash on a budget, or inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash for output quality. Full details below.